George Roland ǀ Denton Defense Lawyer
  • Home
  • About
  • Criminal Defense
    • Felony Drug Charges
    • Possession of Marijuana, K2, and Wax
    • University of North Texas Disciplinary Hearings
    • Assault Charges
    • Theft and Fraud Charges
    • Motion to Adjudicate/Motion To Revoke
    • Sealing Records & Expunctions
  • Contact
  • Blog
Select Page

Three Thoughts About Schools & Juvenile Law: Part Three, Limitations on School Searches

by georgeroland | Jun 19, 2014 | Uncategorized

  The standard for school searches of students, backpacks, and such was discussed last time. Recall that the Fourth Amendment bars “unreasonable” searches and seizures, so the critical inquiry is what constitutes “reasonable” searches at school. In order to be...

Three Thoughts About Schools & Juvenile Law: Part Two, The Standard for School Searches

by georgeroland | Jun 17, 2014 | Uncategorized

  A large number of juvenile offenses happen at school. I recall once telling a prosecutor who seemed particularly disturbed by the fact that my 14 year-old client had graffiti’d, of all places, a school—A SCHOOL!!—that his chosen location seemed perfectly...

Three Thoughts About Schools and Juvenile Law: Part One, What Schools and Prisons Have in Common

by georgeroland | Jun 12, 2014 | Uncategorized

    In his book, Surveiller et punir: naissance de la prison (roughly translated as “Discipline and Punish: the birth of the prison”), Michel Foucault discusses a social theory called “panopticism.”       The basic idea of panopticism is the...

Weighing the Pot: what “usable quantity” means under Texas Law

by georgeroland | Jun 8, 2014 | Uncategorized

In a Class B possession of marijuana case, the State has the burden to prove that the defendant knowingly or intentionally possessed a usable quantity of marijuana in an amount two ounces or less. TEXAS HEALTH & SAFETY CODE s481.121(b)(1). No “usable quantity”, no...

Assault Family Violence & Equal Protection in Texas

by georgeroland | May 28, 2014 | Uncategorized

Courts have, for over a century now, considered a MAN assaulting a WOMAN to be a crime of “moral turpitude.” See Curtis v. State, 81 S.W. 29 (Tex.Crim. 1904); Stewart v. State, 272 S.W. 202 (Tex.Crim. 1925); Lloyd v. State, 204 S.W.2d 633 (Tex.Crim. 1947); Dempsey v....

Confidential Informants & Why They Aren’t So “Confidential”

by georgeroland | May 8, 2014 | Uncategorized

I would imagine that a great number of confidential informants (that’s the police word for them; to everyone else, they are generally known as “snitches”) are surprised to learn that their identity is not so “confidential” after all.   The privilege to refuse to...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »
Copyright (c) 2020 George Roland | Denton Criminal Defense Lawyer. All rights reserved.